Topic selection, writing, image production, pre-publication review, and publishing records — we take on the operating work a blog needs. Korean channels center on Naver blog, while overseas channels are localized for the platforms local readers actually use, such as note and Ameba in Japan. Nothing goes live before your team reviews and approves it.
We look at search intent, service topics, frequently asked questions, and everything already published, then set a monthly topic map and publishing order. New topics are checked against existing posts so the same angle is not published twice.
Body copy is written to each channel's tone and length. Diagrams and illustrations follow a production standard that keeps labels accurate, while real photos and video assets keep their original form.
Only drafts that pass expression and evidence review, a search and AI-answer check, and a quality review by someone other than the writer move on to publishing.
Overseas posts are rewritten rather than translated: local wording standards, terminology, and platform format are adjusted per channel — note and Ameba are handled as separate formats for Japan — and reviewed so nothing reads awkwardly to a local reader.
We organize a channel diagnosis, a monthly topic map with publishing order, one sample post, image production standards, a pre-publication review checklist, and a publishing-record method.
We review your blog's categories, existing posts, publishing cadence, and wording standards.
We build the topic map and align tone and format with one sample post.
Posts and images are produced, pass the review loop, and go to your team for confirmation.
Approved posts are published and recorded by date and topic so nothing goes out twice. Account handling scope is agreed in the consultation, and new channels expand on the same standard.
Marketing automation designs the draft generation and publishing workflow so your team can run it. The blog operations service means we do the work — topic selection, writing, images, and review. You can combine both, or start with the service and move to automation later.
No. We do not promise rankings or traffic volume. We focus on writing that search engines and AI answers can read accurately, and on a publishing cadence that can be sustained.
Our baseline is Japanese-market operation on note and Ameba. Other languages and platforms are scoped after we review your target customers and channel situation.
No. Even when AI helps with a draft, the post goes through fact checking, wording review, and a quality review by someone other than the writer, then owner approval before publishing. Unverified figures and unsupported claims are left out.
They depend on the number of channels, posts per month, language coverage, and how much source material exists. After reviewing your current operation in a consultation, we provide a clear scope and cost baseline.
Yes, you can write blog posts with ChatGPT. Search and AI answer environments judge content by accuracy and usefulness, not by the writing tool. Here are the problems with publishing raw drafts and the operating rules that turn AI writing into results.
Naver builds results around its own content areas like blogs and Place, while Google collects, indexes, and ranks web documents. This post compares the two engines and how to prepare for each channel.
For service businesses with foreign-language customers, translation alone is not enough. The service structure, FAQs, CTAs, and staff handoff rules need to stay consistent in each language.